Back to Reading List
[Multimodal]·PAP-7KOEXP·2023·April 8, 2026

Rocks, Pebbles and Sand: Modality-aware Scheduling for Multimodal Large Language Model Inference

2023

Konstantinos Papaioannou, Thaleia Dimitra Doudali

4 min readMultimodalArchitectureEfficiency

Core Insight

RPS-Serve slashes MLLM latency by prioritizing video, image, and text efficiently.

By the Numbers

54%

reduction in inference latency

78.5%

improvement in latency-critical tasks

Rocks, Pebbles, Sand

modality categorization

time-to-first-token (TTFT)

key performance metric

In Plain English

The paper introduces RPS-Serve, a scheduler that reduces inference latency in multimodal models by 54%. It ensures fast processing of large requests like videos alongside smaller text and images by dynamically prioritizing them.

Knowledge Prerequisites

git blame for knowledge

To fully understand Rocks, Pebbles and Sand: Modality-aware Scheduling for Multimodal Large Language Model Inference, trace this dependency chain first. Papers in our library are linked — click to read them.

DIRECT PREREQIN LIBRARY
Attention Is All You Need

This paper introduces the Transformer architecture, which is foundational for understanding how modern multimodal large language models function.

attention mechanismtransformer networksself-attention
DIRECT PREREQIN LIBRARY
Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models

Understanding the compute-optimal approaches to training helps in grasping efficiency challenges in multimodal model scheduling.

compute-efficiencyscaling lawstraining techniques
DIRECT PREREQIN LIBRARY
Llama 4: The Frontier of Multimodal Intelligence

This paper provides insights into multimodal capabilities, critical for understanding the integration of different modalities in language models.

multimodal intelligenceintegration of modalitieslarge language models
DIRECT PREREQIN LIBRARY
FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness

Understanding optimized attention mechanisms is crucial for grasping efficient scheduling in large language models.

IO-awarenessmemory efficiencyfast attention
DIRECT PREREQIN LIBRARY
Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision

This paper illustrates speech processing aspects in language models, highlighting considerations in multimodal systems.

weak supervisionspeech recognitionlarge-scale models

YOU ARE HERE

Rocks, Pebbles and Sand: Modality-aware Scheduling for Multimodal Large Language Model Inference

The Idea Graph

The Idea Graph
15 nodes · 20 edges
Click a node to explore · Drag to pan · Scroll to zoom
2,421 words · 13 min read12 sections · 15 concepts

Table of Contents

01

The World Before: Challenges in Multimodal Processing

271 words

The landscape of artificial intelligence before the advent of RPS-Serve was marked by an increasing need for handling efficiently. Applications such as ChatGPT, which require simultaneous processing of diverse data types like text, images, and videos, struggled with existing systems. These systems often relied on basic scheduling techniques that processed requests sequentially, leading to significant delays, particularly when large video files were involved. This inefficiency was primarily due to the inability of traditional methods to distinguish and prioritize requests based on their size and latency requirements.

pose a unique challenge because they involve delivering seamless interactions across different modalities. For instance, a user might ask a virtual assistant to analyze a video and simultaneously query textual information. The current systems were not equipped to handle such requests effectively, often leading to , where smaller, more urgent requests were delayed by larger, less critical ones. This was particularly problematic for real-time applications where swift response times are crucial.

were typically designed for simpler, unimodal tasks, and they failed to account for the complex dynamics of multimodal interactions. They lacked the ability to dynamically prioritize requests, treating all tasks with a one-size-fits-all approach. This resulted in inefficient resource allocation and increased Time-to-First-Token (TTFT), a critical metric that reflects the system's responsiveness.

In this context, improving the handling of became imperative. The need was not just to speed up processing times but also to ensure fair allocation of resources across different types of requests. This called for a fresh perspective on scheduling strategies, one that could accommodate the varied demands of modern AI applications.

02

The Specific Failure: Latency Bottlenecks

216 words

The specific technical problem that motivated this work was the latency bottleneck caused by large video requests in multimodal systems. Imagine a scenario where a user uploads a high-resolution video for analysis while simultaneously querying text-based information. Traditional systems, due to their sequential processing nature, would start by handling the video request, effectively blocking the processing of smaller, latency-sensitive text or image requests.

These were not just theoretical inconveniences but had real-world implications. For example, in applications like virtual assistants, where users expect immediate answers, such delays can significantly degrade user experience. The latency was measured by the Time-to-First-Token, which often stretched beyond acceptable limits, causing user dissatisfaction and reducing the overall efficacy of the system.

Attempts to resolve these issues using existing scheduling methods proved inadequate. These methods, originally designed for simpler tasks, could not dynamically adjust to the demands of different modalities. As a result, they often led to inefficient processing and resource allocation, failing to meet the latency requirements of modern applications.

The need for a solution that could intelligently prioritize requests based on their modality and urgency became increasingly evident. This solution had to go beyond the capabilities of existing methods, offering a more nuanced approach to scheduling that could effectively manage the diverse and demanding nature of .

03

The Key Insight: Rocks, Pebbles, and Sand

252 words

The breakthrough insight that led to the development of RPS-Serve was the 'Rocks, Pebbles, Sand' analogy. This metaphor elegantly captures the challenge of scheduling multimodal requests by categorizing them based on size and urgency. Imagine a jar that you need to fill with rocks, pebbles, and sand. If you start with the sand, you won't have room for the rocks. However, if you begin with the rocks, followed by pebbles, and finally the sand, everything fits perfectly. This analogy translates directly to scheduling: prioritize larger, less frequent requests (rocks) in a way that allows smaller, more frequent requests (sand) to fill the gaps.

The provided a new framework for understanding how to efficiently manage multimodal requests. By categorizing requests into rocks (videos), pebbles (images), and sand (text), the system could dynamically adjust its processing priorities, ensuring that latency-sensitive tasks like text processing were not unduly delayed by larger video files.

This insight was not just a clever metaphor but a practical guide for designing a that could dynamically prioritize requests. The analogy helped in visualizing the scheduling problem in a way that highlighted the need for flexibility and adaptability, two qualities that were missing in prior scheduling methods.

By adopting this approach, the scheduler could more effectively allocate resources, reducing bottlenecks and improving overall system responsiveness. This insight laid the foundation for the development of RPS-Serve, a scheduling framework that could transform multimodal interactions by ensuring that all types of requests were processed efficiently and fairly.

04

Architecture Overview: Modality-aware Scheduling

213 words

The architecture of is centered around the concept of a , which is designed to handle the diverse and demanding nature of multimodal requests. At its core, the scheduler utilizes the Rocks, Pebbles, Sand analogy to categorize and prioritize tasks based on their size and urgency. This categorization allows the system to dynamically adjust its processing priorities, ensuring that all requests are handled efficiently.

is a key feature of this architecture. By continuously assessing the current system load and the characteristics of incoming requests, the scheduler can make real-time decisions about which tasks to prioritize. This approach ensures that smaller, latency-sensitive requests are processed promptly, even in the presence of larger, less urgent tasks.

The is another crucial component of the architecture. This mechanism prevents starvation by gradually increasing the priority of requests that have been waiting in the queue for an extended period. By doing so, the system ensures that all requests eventually receive processing time, balancing efficiency with fairness.

integrates these components into a cohesive framework that significantly improves the handling of multimodal requests. By adopting a modality-aware approach, the scheduler can effectively manage diverse data types and processing demands, leading to a substantial reduction in latency and an improvement in overall system performance.

05

Deep Dive: Dynamic Prioritization

199 words

is a cornerstone of the architecture, enabling the system to efficiently manage multimodal requests. This component allows the scheduler to continuously evaluate the current workload and adjust processing priorities in real-time. By doing so, it ensures that smaller, latency-sensitive tasks are not delayed by larger, less urgent requests.

Imagine a system receiving a continuous flow of requests, ranging from small text queries to large video analysis tasks. Without , the system would process these requests sequentially, potentially leading to significant delays for smaller tasks. However, with , the scheduler can quickly identify and prioritize tasks that require immediate attention, ensuring that they are processed promptly.

The dynamic nature of this prioritization means that the system is constantly adapting to the changing demands of incoming requests. This flexibility is crucial for maintaining system responsiveness, particularly in environments where the volume and type of requests can vary significantly over time.

By integrating into its architecture, can effectively manage the diverse processing needs of multimodal requests, ensuring that all tasks are handled efficiently and fairly. This component is essential for achieving the significant reductions in latency and improvements in system performance that offers.

06

Deep Dive: The Aging Mechanism

220 words

The is a critical component of the scheduling framework, designed to prevent starvation and ensure fairness in processing multimodal requests. In a system where requests vary significantly in size and urgency, there is a risk that smaller, more frequent tasks could indefinitely delay larger, less frequent ones. The addresses this challenge by gradually increasing the priority of requests that have been waiting in the queue for an extended period.

Imagine a queue where a large video request has been waiting while smaller text requests are processed. Without an , this video request might continue to be deprioritized, leading to potential delays in its processing. However, with the in place, the priority of the video request increases over time, ensuring that it eventually receives the necessary processing resources.

This mechanism is essential for balancing efficiency and fairness in a multimodal environment. While ensures that urgent tasks are handled promptly, the guarantees that all requests, regardless of size or initial priority, are eventually processed. This balance is crucial for maintaining system integrity and ensuring that all users receive a fair level of service.

By integrating the into its architecture, can effectively manage the diverse demands of multimodal requests, ensuring that all tasks are handled efficiently and equitably.

07

Training & Data: Preparing RPS-Serve

195 words

Training involves preparing the system to handle a wide range of multimodal requests efficiently. This preparation includes fine-tuning the scheduler's parameters to ensure optimal performance across different types of data, such as text, images, and videos. The training process is designed to equip the scheduler with the ability to dynamically prioritize requests based on their modality and urgency.

The data used for training is diverse, encompassing a variety of scenarios that the system might encounter in real-world applications. This diversity is crucial for ensuring that the scheduler can handle unexpected situations and adapt to changing demands. By exposing the system to a wide range of request types and sizes, the training process helps learn how to effectively allocate resources and manage processing priorities.

The objective function used during training focuses on minimizing latency, particularly the Time-to-First-Token (TTFT), while ensuring fairness in resource allocation. By optimizing for these metrics, the training process helps achieve its goal of reducing latency and improving system responsiveness.

Through rigorous training and careful data selection, is prepared to handle the complex and demanding nature of multimodal requests, ensuring that all tasks are processed efficiently and equitably.

08

Key Results: Performance Improvements

190 words

The performance improvements achieved by RPS-Serve are substantial, particularly in terms of reducing latency and improving . One of the most significant metrics is the reduction in (TTFT), which measures the latency between receiving a request and generating the first piece of output. RPS-Serve achieves a 54% decrease in TTFT, demonstrating its effectiveness in handling multimodal requests efficiently.

In addition to reducing TTFT, RPS-Serve also achieves a remarkable 78.5% improvement for latency-critical tasks compared to traditional scheduling methods. This improvement highlights the scheduler's ability to prioritize and manage requests with varying latency requirements effectively. By doing so, RPS-Serve ensures that all types of requests are processed promptly, regardless of their size or urgency.

These improvements are not just theoretical but have real-world implications for applications like ChatGPT and Copilot, where user engagement depends on fast and accurate responses. By enhancing , RPS-Serve can deliver a more seamless and satisfying user experience, driving competitive advantages for platforms that integrate these capabilities into their server architectures.

Overall, the key results achieved by RPS-Serve demonstrate its effectiveness in transforming multimodal interactions, ensuring that all requests are handled efficiently and equitably.

09

Ablation Studies: Understanding Component Impact

178 words

Ablation studies are an essential part of evaluating any complex system, and is no exception. These studies involve systematically removing or altering components of the scheduler to assess their individual impact on overall performance. Through these experiments, the importance of each component, such as and the , can be thoroughly understood.

For instance, an ablation study that disables might lead to an increase in the Time-to-First-Token (TTFT), illustrating the crucial role this component plays in reducing latency. Similarly, removing the could result in certain requests experiencing starvation, highlighting the importance of this mechanism in ensuring fairness and preventing delays for larger requests.

These studies reveal that while 's overall architecture is highly effective, each component contributes uniquely to its performance. Understanding these contributions allows for further optimization and refinement of the scheduler, ensuring that it continues to meet the demands of increasingly complex multimodal interactions.

Through ablation studies, the robustness of is validated, confirming that its architecture is well-suited to handle the diverse and demanding nature of real-world applications.

10

What This Changed: Impact on the Field

166 words

The introduction of has had a significant impact on the field of multimodal processing, setting a new standard for how these systems handle diverse requests. By demonstrating the effectiveness of a Modality-aware Scheduler, has shown that it is possible to achieve significant reductions in latency while maintaining fairness and efficiency.

This advancement has implications for a wide range of applications, from virtual assistants like ChatGPT to more complex systems like Gemini and Copilot. By integrating into their server architectures, these platforms can achieve faster, more seamless user experiences, driving competitive advantages in an increasingly crowded market.

Beyond immediate product applications, has also opened the door for further research and innovation in the field. Its success highlights the potential for modality-aware scheduling to transform how we approach multimodal interactions, providing a foundation for future developments and improvements.

Overall, represents a significant step forward in the field, demonstrating the potential for innovative scheduling solutions to enhance the performance and responsiveness of multimodal systems.

11

Limitations & Open Questions: Areas for Improvement

166 words

Despite its significant achievements, is not without its limitations. One of the potential challenges is scaling the scheduler to handle even more complex multimodal systems or adapting it to radically different data types beyond text, image, and video. This limitation highlights the need for ongoing research and innovation in the field.

Furthermore, while significantly reduces latency, there may be specific domains or edge cases where its performance benefits are less pronounced. Understanding these limitations is crucial for further refining the scheduler and ensuring that it meets the diverse demands of all applications.

Open questions remain around optimizing for specific use cases and integrating it with emerging technologies. As the field of multimodal processing continues to evolve, there are ongoing opportunities for exploration and development, ensuring that remains at the forefront of innovation.

By acknowledging these limitations and open questions, the field can continue to advance, building on the successes of and pushing the boundaries of what is possible in multimodal processing.

12

Why You Should Care: Product Implications

155 words

For product managers and developers, the implications of are profound. By significantly reducing latency and improving , this scheduler can transform the user experience for applications that rely on multimodal interactions. Platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot can benefit from 's efficiency, delivering faster, more seamless interactions with complex content.

Integrating into server architectures can drive competitive advantages, particularly in industries where user engagement and satisfaction are critical. By enhancing the speed and accuracy of responses, products can differentiate themselves in a crowded market, attracting and retaining users through superior performance.

Beyond immediate product benefits, also sets a new standard for scheduling in multimodal systems. Its success highlights the potential for innovative solutions to transform how we approach complex interactions, providing a foundation for future developments and improvements.

Overall, represents a significant step forward for product managers and developers, offering new opportunities for enhancing performance and delivering exceptional user experiences.

Experience It

Live Experiment

Modality-aware Scheduling

See Modality-aware Scheduling in Action

Users will see a side-by-side comparison of processing speeds for multimodal requests with and without RPS-Serve. This reveals how RPS-Serve efficiently prioritizes and processes different types of media, reducing overall latency.

Notice how RPS-Serve significantly reduces the processing time for smaller requests even when large video requests are present.

Try an example — see the difference instantly

⌘↵ to run

How grounded is this content?

Metrics are computed from available source text only — abstract, summary, and impact fields ingested into this system. Full paper PDF is not ingested; numerical claims that originate from within the paper body will not appear in these scores.

Source Richness88%

7 of 8 content fields populated. More fields = better-grounded generation.

Source Depth~233 words

Total source text analyzed by the model. Includes extended deep-dive summary — high confidence.

Number Grounding2 / 4

Key statistics whose numeric values appear verbatim in ingested source text. Unverified stats may originate from the full paper body.

Quote Traceability3 / 3

Key passages whose significant vocabulary (≥4-char words) overlap ≥35% with source text. Measures lexical traceability, not semantic accuracy.

Methodology: Number grounding uses regex digit extraction against source text. Quote traceability uses token set intersection on content words stripped of stop-words. Neither metric validates semantic correctness or factual accuracy against the original paper. For full verification, cross-reference with the original paper via the arXiv link above.